Read and Compare Energies
On this page
Tako displays energies from several operations, but the scientific quantity depends on the operation and result field. A Single Point energy belongs to the supplied geometry. An Optimization final energy belongs to the final optimizer frame. An MD final energy is one instantaneous endpoint. Molecular vibration ZPE is a separate nested correction. This page describes the interface and artifacts; the quantity hierarchy is developed in Comparable Energies and Thermodynamic Cycles.
Identify the operation and result state
Select the calculation in Explorer or the right Calc panel. Before reading a number, confirm:
- operation type;
- status is Completed rather than Running, Failed, or Canceled — Completed only means the worker returned normally, not optimizer convergence, correct chemistry, a minimum, or thermodynamic comparability;
convergedis true when the operation reports it;- final structure is the intended state, with method, charge/spin, environment, cell, and constraints matching the comparison protocol.
Read the authoritative field
Open result.json and use the operation-specific field:
| Operation | Primary energy field | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Single Point | energy_ev / energy_hartree | model energy at the exact input geometry |
| Optimization | final_energy_ev / final_energy_hartree | final accepted optimizer geometry; require converged: true |
| Reaction path | image/profile fields and reaction_barrier | path electronic/model energies, not free-energy barriers |
| Molecular dynamics | final_energy_ev plus trace/frame energies | instantaneous or sampled trajectory potential energy, not a minimum/free energy |
| Vibration | vibrations.zero_point_energy_ev | harmonic ZPE only; no electronic energy in the vibration result |
The headline Calc panel can show a final energy for common operations, but result.json is authoritative for field identity, convergence, settings, and units. Preserve the Hartree value when available and convert only for presentation.
Read force convergence separately
Energy change alone is not an optimization convergence test. For Optimization, inspect final_fmax_ev_per_angstrom, the requested settings.fmax_ev_per_angstrom, steps, and converged; in variable-cell relaxation the reported maximum can come from a scaled cell row rather than an atom, so it is not guaranteed to be a Cartesian atomic force. Single Point forces diagnose whether a supplied geometry is stationary on that model surface — a low relative energy with large forces is a low sampled point, not a relaxed minimum.
Build a comparison table
Create one row per physical state:
| State | Formula/cell | Charge/spin | Method/settings | Geometry policy | Converged | Energy / eV | Relative / eV |
|---|
Choose one reference only after all compatibility checks pass, then calculate . Do not overwrite absolute energies with shifted values; keep both so the comparison can be audited. When compositions differ, a simple minimum-relative table is normally invalid — build a balanced cycle instead. Cycle construction and its rationale (deformation, coverage, sign convention) are developed in Comparable Energies and Thermodynamic Cycles.
Add ZPE only from matching calculations
Open the matching Vibration result.json and read vibrations.zero_point_energy_ev, verifying that its input geometry is the same optimized state and uses the same model, charge, spin, and constraints. Calculate externally; Tako does not create this sum or a thermochemistry artifact. Do not use imaginary-mode magnitudes as stable harmonic contributions — a meaningful imaginary internal mode invalidates minimum RRHO thermochemistry.
Build reaction and binding cycles
For every term, record signed coefficient, composition, charge, spin, method, geometry, and correction level. Verify atom and charge balance before arithmetic, and never subtract a GFN2 total energy from an MLIP total energy — build the entire cycle within each method and compare derived differences. The interface has no controls or artifacts for temperature/pressure, partition functions, thermal/entropic corrections, enthalpy, Gibbs energy, standard-state conversion, or conformer-ensemble free energy, so report results as an electronic/model-energy difference (optionally with separately added harmonic ZPE) unless those terms were calculated externally. Binding, adsorption, and voltage sign conventions and the full model-energy-to-free-energy quantity hierarchy are developed in Comparable Energies and Thermodynamic Cycles.
Check units and normalization
Tako result fields state Hartree or eV. A comparison additionally needs a denominator: per molecule, atom, formula unit, surface area, adsorbate, inserted ion, or transferred electron. Do not compare “eV/atom” values obtained from cells with inconsistent formula definitions; for voltage, eV per transferred electron is numerically volts only after electron count and reaction direction are defined.
Reject invalid terms
Exclude a state when any of the following applies:
- failed/canceled calculation;
- explicit
converged: falsefor a required optimized state; - wrong charge/spin/composition or malformed geometry;
- mismatched calculator asset, dispersion, solvent, SCF, cell, or constraints;
- missing reference species or unbalanced cycle;
- reaction endpoint/path not representing the intended mechanism;
- vibration correction from a different state/protocol;
- meaningful imaginary mode in a claimed minimum;
- trajectory endpoint presented as an equilibrium/free-energy state.
Do not replace a missing energy with zero, and do not keep a state that failed the checks above.
Report the comparison
State the named quantity and omissions. A precise minimal statement is:
Relative GFN2+D4 model energies at separately optimized geometries, reported in eV relative to conformer A; no ZPE, thermal, entropic, conformational-ensemble, or standard-state corrections.
For corrected data, list each contribution separately before the total. Preserve raw result files, final structures, vibration files, calculation settings, and the comparison table.
Diagnose common mistakes
| Observation | Problem | Response |
|---|---|---|
lower energy but converged: false | optimizer stopped before force gate | reject or continue optimization |
| two methods differ by huge absolute value | energy zeros differ | compare balanced differences within each method |
| binding value changes after fragment relaxation | deformation policy changed | report interaction and deformation components separately |
| MD endpoint ranks below optimized state | endpoint is an instantaneous configuration | optimize/average according to the scientific question |
“free energy” table contains only energy_ev | thermal/entropy terms were omitted | rename to model/electronic energy or calculate corrections externally |
For reproducible arithmetic and exact helper behavior, use Energy Analysis with Tako Script.